Proximal threats promote enhanced acquisition and persistence of reactive fear-learning circuits

Access Data

Abstract

Physical proximity to a traumatic event increases the severity of accompanying stress symptoms, an effect that is reminiscent of evolutionarily configured fear responses based on threat imminence. Despite being widely adopted as a model system for stress and anxiety disorders, fear-conditioning research has not yet characterized how threat proximity impacts the mechanisms of fear acquisition and extinction in the human brain. We used three-dimensional (3D) virtual reality technology to manipulate the egocentric distance of conspecific threats while healthy adult participants navigated virtual worlds during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Consistent with theoretical predictions, proximal threats enhanced fear acquisition by shifting conditioned learning from cognitive to reactive fear circuits in the brain and reducing amygdala–cortical connectivity during both fear acquisition and extinction. With an analysis of representational pattern similarity between the acquisition and extinction phases, we further demonstrate that proximal threats impaired extinction efficacy via persistent multivariate representations of conditioned learning in the cerebellum, which predicted susceptibility to later fear reinstatement. These results show that conditioned threats encountered in close proximity are more resistant to extinction learning and suggest that the canonical neural circuitry typically associated with fear learning requires additional consideration of a more reactive neural fear system to fully account for this effect.

ID 182

Authors

Leonard Faul, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 Daniel Stjepanović, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia Joshua M. Stivers, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 Gregory W. Stewart, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 John L. Graner, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 Rajendra A. Morey, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 Kevin S. LaBar, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710

Year

2020

DOI of Publication

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004258117

Persistent Identifier to Dataset

10.17605/OSF.IO/JM62Y

Where was the data collected?

Duke University, USA

How to Cite

Faul, L., Stjepanović, D., Stivers, J. M., Stewart, G. W., Graner, J. L., Morey, R. A., & LaBar, K. S. (2020). Proximal threats promote enhanced acquisition and persistence of reactive fear-learning circuits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(28), 16678–16689. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004258117

Participant Information

Participant Age

Participant Sex

Experimental Group

- Number of experimental groups: 1 (within-subject design) - Number of experimental conditions: 4 (CS+Near, CS+Far, CS−Near, CS−Far) - Independent variables: -- IV1: CS Type (CS+ [paired with US] vs. CS− [unpaired]) -- IV2: Distance (Near [0.6 m] vs. Far [3 m])

Stimuli

Drug Administration

No

Conditioning Protocol

Cue-Context-Conditioning

Instructions CS-US Contingencies

Partially instructed (whole exp)

Number of Different US

1

US Modality

electrotactile

Number of Different CS+

2

CS+ 1: Reinforcement Rate (%)

50

CS+ 2: Reinforcement Rate (%)

50

CS+ 3: Reinforcement Rate (%)

Number of Different CS-

2

CS Modality

visual

Data Collected During MRI

Yes

Physiological Measures

measured trialwise & untransformed

Skin Conductance Response

Yes Yes

Skin Conductance Level

No No

Pupil Size

No No

Fear Potentiated Startle/Startle EMG

No No

Heart Rate

No No

Ratings

US Expectancy

Yes

US Intensity Rating

No

CS Valence

No

CS Arousal

No

CS Fear

No

CS Stress

No

CS Anxiety

No

Contingency Awareness

No

Questionnaires