Effects of Approach-Avoidance Training on the Extinction and Return of Fear Responses
Abstract
Background and Objectives Exposure therapy for anxiety involves confronting a patient with fear-evoking stimuli, a procedure based partially on Pavlovian extinction. Exposure and other extinction-based therapies usually lead to (partial) reduction of fear symptoms, but a substantial number of patients experience a return of fear after treatment. Here we tested whether the combination of fear extinction with modification of approach-avoidance tendencies using an Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) would result in the further reduction of conditioned fear and/or help prevent return of fear after extinction. Methods Two groups of participants underwent a fear acquisition procedure during which pictures of one neutral object were sometimes paired with shock (CS+), whereas pictures of another neutral object were not (CS−). The next day, in a fear extinction procedure, both objects were presented without shock. During the subsequent joystick AAT, one group primarily pulled CS+ pictures towards themselves and pushed CS− pictures away from themselves; reversed contingencies applied for the other group. Results Approach training was effective in modifying conditioned action tendencies, with some evidence for transfer to a different approach/avoidance task. No group differences in subjective fear or physiological arousal were found during subsequent post- training and return-of-fear testing. Limitations No reliable return-of-fear was observed in either group for either subjective or physiological fear measures. Conclusions Our results suggest that approach training may be of limited value for enhancing the short- and long-term effects of extinction-based interventions.
Authors
Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands Inna Arnaudova, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands Marieke Effting, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands Merel Kindt, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands Tom Beckers, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Year
2015
DOI of Publication
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131581
Is Version of
Where was the data collected?
University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
How to Cite
Krypotos, A., & Beckers, T. (2026, April 2). Effects of approach-avoidance training on the extinction and return of fear responses. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3APXV
Participant Information
Participant Age
Participant Sex
Experimental Group
Avoid CS+ Group (n=18): This group was trained during the joystick Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) to primarily PUSH the joystick (avoid) in response to CS+ pictures (89% of the time) and PULL the joystick (approach) in response to CS− pictures (11% of the time). Approach CS+ Group (n=22): This group was trained during the joystick Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) to primarily PULL the joystick (approach) in response to CS+ pictures (89% of the time) and PUSH the joystick (avoid) in response to CS− pictures (11% of the time; opposite contingencies).
Stimuli
Drug Administration
NoConditioning Protocol
Instructions CS-US Contingencies
Number of Different US
US Modality
US Duration (ms)
Time Between CS and US Onset (ms)
Number of Different CS+
CS+ Duration (ms)
CS+ 1: Reinforcement Rate (%)
CS+ 2: Reinforcement Rate (%)
CS+ 3: Reinforcement Rate (%)
Number of Different CS-
CS- Duration (ms)
CS Modality
Data Collected During MRI
NoMeasures
skin conductance response
Amplitude of skin conductance response to stimulus.
fear potentiated startle (emg)
Fear potentiated startle response (electromyography).
US expectancy rating
US expectancy rating of the CS stimuli.
US intensity rating
Intensity rating of the US stimulus.
State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S)
State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T)
Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI)
| Name | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| skin conductance response | Amplitude of skin conductance response to stimulus. | |
| fear potentiated startle (emg) | Fear potentiated startle response (electromyography). | trialwise & untransformed |
| US expectancy rating | US expectancy rating of the CS stimuli. | |
| US intensity rating | Intensity rating of the US stimulus. | |
| State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) | ||
| State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) | ||
| Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) |