Incentive-based, instructed, and social observational extinction of avoidance: Fear-opposite actions and their influence on fear extinction
Abstract
Avoidance is a transdiagnostic symptom of clinical anxiety and its reduction a major focus of cognitive-behavioral treatments. This study examined the instrumental extinction of goal-directed avoidance by means of incentives, verbal instruction, and social observation and their influence on fear extinction. Participants acquired conditioned fear and instrumental avoidance responses (N = 160). In four randomized groups, the reduction of avoidance by incentives for non-avoidance, instructions to refrain from avoidance, and social observation of non-avoidance was compared to no intervention before removing the aversive outcome. Conditioned fear when avoidance became unavailable subsequently was tested. Incentives, instruction, and observation all reduced avoidance better than no intervention, however, with different degrees and influence on conditioned fear. Incentives and instructions strongly reduced avoidance despite high levels of fear (i.e., fear-opposite actions). This initiated fear extinction, thereby reducing conditioned fear when avoidance became unavailable. Social observation directly reduced conditioned fear, presumably because it conveyed additional information about the absence of the aversive outcome. However, observation only moderately reduced avoidance and resulted in higher fear when avoidance became unavailable. The effects of social observation may depend on the nuances of the demonstrator's behavior. The clear effects of incentive and instructions provide support for clinical interventions to reduce avoidance during exposure therapy and can serve as experimental models for their controlled investigation.
Authors
Andre Pittig, Department of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Center of Mental Health, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany Alex H.K. Wong, Department of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy), University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Year
2021
DOI of Publication
Is Version of
Where was the data collected?
University of Würzburg, Germany
How to Cite
Pittig, A., & Wong, A. H. K. (2021). Incentive-based, instructed, and social observational extinction of avoidance: Fear-opposite actions and their influence on fear extinction. Behaviour research and therapy, 137, 103797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2020.103797
Participant Information
Participant Age
Participant Sex
Experimental Group
The Incentive group received a small monetary incentive for non-avoidance responses and participants had to learn the avoidance-reward contingencies by trial and error. The Instruction group was instructed to perform non-avoidance responses to test whether their US expectancy matches the actual outcome. This served as a laboratory proxy for the exposure rationale described above. The Observation group watched a demonstrator repeatedly performing non-avoidance responses. Importantly, all instructions and the video provided information on (non-) avoidance responses, but no explicit information about US occurrence was given. This served as a laboratory proxy for specific exposure exercises in which the therapist models the designated behavior (e.g., interoceptive exposures) or experience that other individuals show non-avoidance responses in daily life (e.g., taking the bus). Finally, the No-Intervention group served as a control group, in which participants did not receive specific intervention before extinction and were merely instructed to take a short break and keep paying attention. We expected a higher reduction of avoidance in the Incentive, Instruction, and Observation compared to the No-Intervention group.
Stimuli
Drug Administration
NoConditioning Protocol
Instructions CS-US Contingencies
Number of Different US
US Modality
US Duration (ms)
Time Between CS and US Onset (ms)
Number of Different CS+
CS+ Duration (ms)
CS+ 1: Reinforcement Rate (%)
CS+ 2: Reinforcement Rate (%)
CS+ 3: Reinforcement Rate (%)
Number of Different CS-
CS- Duration (ms)
CS Modality
Data Collected During MRI
NoMeasures
skin conductance response
Amplitude of skin conductance response to stimulus.
US expectancy rating
US expectancy rating of the CS stimuli.
US intensity rating
Intensity rating of the US stimulus.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T)
| Name | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| skin conductance response | Amplitude of skin conductance response to stimulus. | trialwise & untransformed |
| US expectancy rating | US expectancy rating of the CS stimuli. | |
| US intensity rating | Intensity rating of the US stimulus. | |
| Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) | ||
| State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) |