A cognitively demanding working-memory intervention enhances extinction

ID 220 2 Reuses

Abstract

Improving extinction learning has the potential to optimize psychotherapy for persistent anxiety-related disorders. Recent findings show that extinction learning can be improved with a cognitively demanding eye-movement intervention. It is, however, unclear whether [1] any cognitively-demanding task can enhance extinction, or whether it is limited to eye movements, and [2] the effectiveness of such an intervention can be enhanced by increasing cognitive load. Participants (n = 102, n = 75 included in the final sample) completed a Pavlovian threat conditioning paradigm across two days. One group underwent standard extinction (Control), a second group underwent extinction paired with a 1-back working memory task (Low-Load), and a third group underwent extinction paired with a 2-back working memory task (High-Load). We found that the conditioned response during extinction was reduced for both the Low-Load and the High-Load groups compared to the Control group. This reduction persisted during recovery the following day when no working memory task was executed. Finally, we found that within the High-Load group, participants with lower accuracy scores on the 2-back task (i.e., for who the task was more difficult) had a stronger reduction in the conditioned response. We did not observe this relationship within the Low-Load group. Our findings suggest that cognitive load induced by a working memory intervention embedded during extinction reduces persistent threat responses.

Authors

Lycia D. De Voogd, Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA Elizabeth A. Phelps, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA

Year

2020

DOI of Publication

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63811-0

Is Version of

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R25F4

Where was the data collected?

New York University, New York, USA

How to Cite

de Voogd, L., & Phelps, E. A. (2025, December 8). A cognitively demanding working-memory intervention enhances extinction. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R25F4

Participant Information

Participant Age

Participant Sex

Experimental Group

One group underwent standard extinction (Control), a second group underwent extinction paired with a 1-back working memory task (Low-Load), and a third group underwent extinction paired with a 2-back working memory task (High-Load).

Stimuli

Drug Administration

No

Conditioning Protocol

Differential

Instructions CS-US Contingencies

Number of Different US

1

US Modality

electrotactile

US Duration (ms)

Time Between CS and US Onset (ms)

Number of Different CS+

1

CS+ Duration (ms)

CS+ 1: Reinforcement Rate (%)

37.5

CS+ 2: Reinforcement Rate (%)

CS+ 3: Reinforcement Rate (%)

Number of Different CS-

1

CS- Duration (ms)

CS Modality

visual

Data Collected During MRI

No

Measures

skin conductance response

trialwise & untransformed

Amplitude of skin conductance response to stimulus.

Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS)