A cognitively demanding working-memory intervention enhances extinction
Abstract
Improving extinction learning has the potential to optimize psychotherapy for persistent anxiety-related disorders. Recent findings show that extinction learning can be improved with a cognitively demanding eye-movement intervention. It is, however, unclear whether [1] any cognitively-demanding task can enhance extinction, or whether it is limited to eye movements, and [2] the effectiveness of such an intervention can be enhanced by increasing cognitive load. Participants (n = 102, n = 75 included in the final sample) completed a Pavlovian threat conditioning paradigm across two days. One group underwent standard extinction (Control), a second group underwent extinction paired with a 1-back working memory task (Low-Load), and a third group underwent extinction paired with a 2-back working memory task (High-Load). We found that the conditioned response during extinction was reduced for both the Low-Load and the High-Load groups compared to the Control group. This reduction persisted during recovery the following day when no working memory task was executed. Finally, we found that within the High-Load group, participants with lower accuracy scores on the 2-back task (i.e., for who the task was more difficult) had a stronger reduction in the conditioned response. We did not observe this relationship within the Low-Load group. Our findings suggest that cognitive load induced by a working memory intervention embedded during extinction reduces persistent threat responses.
Authors
Lycia D. De Voogd*, Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA Elizabeth A. Phelps, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
Year
2020
DOI of Publication
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63811-0
Is Version of
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R25F4
Where was the data collected?
New York University, New York, USA
How to Cite
de Voogd, L., & Phelps, E. A. (2025, December 8). A cognitively demanding working-memory intervention enhances extinction. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R25F4
Participant Information
Participant Age
Participant Sex
Experimental Group
One group underwent standard extinction (Control), a second group underwent extinction paired with a 1-back working memory task (Low-Load), and a third group underwent extinction paired with a 2-back working memory task (High-Load).
Stimuli
Drug Administration
NoConditioning Protocol
Instructions CS-US Contingencies
Number of Different US
US Modality
US Duration (ms)
Time Between CS and US Onset (ms)
Number of Different CS+
CS+ Duration (ms)
CS+ 1: Reinforcement Rate (%)
CS+ 2: Reinforcement Rate (%)
CS+ 3: Reinforcement Rate (%)
Number of Different CS-
CS- Duration (ms)
CS Modality
Data Collected During MRI
NoMeasures
skin conductance response
Amplitude of skin conductance response to stimulus.
Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS)
| Name | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| skin conductance response | Amplitude of skin conductance response to stimulus. | trialwise & untransformed |
| Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS) |